NPS vs CSAT

Net Promoter Score and Customer Satisfaction Score compared side by side. Understand when each metric applies and how to use both effectively.

Overview

NPS (Net Promoter Score)
Relational

NPS measures overall loyalty and the likelihood of customers recommending your product. It asks a single question on a 0-10 scale and segments respondents into Promoters (9-10), Passives (7-8), and Detractors (0-6).

A long-term, relationship-level metric. Best used quarterly or semi-annually.

CSAT (Customer Satisfaction Score)
Transactional

CSAT measures satisfaction with a specific interaction— a support ticket, a product feature, or an onboarding session. It uses a 1-5 scale and asks "How satisfied were you with [this experience]?"

A short-term, touchpoint-level metric. Best used immediately after specific interactions.

Formula Comparison

NPS Formula

NPS = % Promoters (9-10) - % Detractors (0-6)

Example: 60% Promoters, 10% Passives, 30% Detractors. NPS = 60 - 30 = 30. Range is -100 to +100. Passives are excluded from the calculation.

CSAT Formula

CSAT % = (Satisfied Responses / Total Responses) x 100

Example: 80 customers rated 4 or 5 out of 5, 100 total responses. CSAT = (80 / 100) x 100 = 80%. Only top-box scores (4 and 5) count as "satisfied."

Side-by-Side Comparison

CriteriaNPSCSAT
What It MeasuresOverall brand loyalty and advocacySatisfaction with a specific interaction
Question Asked"How likely are you to recommend us?""How satisfied were you with this experience?"
Scale0-10 (single question)1-5 (or 1-10, varies by implementation)
Score Range-100 to +1000% to 100%
Metric TypeRelational (long-term relationship)Transactional (specific touchpoint)
Survey FrequencyQuarterly or semi-annuallyAfter each relevant interaction
Good Score30+ is good, 50+ is excellent, 70+ is world-class75%+ is good, 85%+ is excellent
PredictsCustomer growth, referrals, long-term retentionShort-term churn risk, process quality
ActionabilityLower (broad signal, harder to act on specifically)Higher (tied to specific process or feature)
Industry Benchmark SourceSatmetrix NPS benchmarks by industryZendesk, Salesforce CX benchmarks

Understanding NPS Score Categories

Promoters (9-10)

Enthusiastic loyalists who will recommend your product and drive organic growth through word of mouth and referrals.

Passives (7-8)

Satisfied but not enthusiastic. Vulnerable to competitive offers. Excluded from the NPS calculation but worth tracking separately.

Detractors (0-6)

Unhappy customers who may actively damage your brand through negative reviews and word of mouth. Require immediate attention.

When to Use Each Metric

Use NPS When...
  • Measuring overall brand health quarterly
  • Tracking loyalty trends after major product changes
  • Benchmarking against industry competitors
  • Identifying at-risk segments for proactive outreach
  • Predicting long-term revenue growth and referral rates
Use CSAT When...
  • Evaluating the quality of a support resolution
  • Measuring onboarding experience satisfaction
  • Getting feedback on a specific feature after launch
  • Identifying friction points in specific workflows
  • Setting and monitoring SLAs for customer-facing teams

Pros & Cons

NPS

Pros

  • Single standardized question, easy to benchmark
  • Correlates with long-term revenue growth
  • Widely understood by executives and investors

Cons

  • Hard to take immediate action from a broad score
  • Survey fatigue if deployed too frequently
  • Culturally biased (some countries rate lower by default)

CSAT

Pros

  • Directly actionable - tied to specific process or feature
  • Immediate signal after customer interactions
  • Flexible - can be used across many touchpoints

Cons

  • Short-term focus misses long-term loyalty signals
  • Scale definitions vary, making cross-company comparison hard
  • Low response rates on post-interaction surveys

Calculate Your NPS Score

Use our free NPS calculator to compute your Net Promoter Score, understand the revenue impact of your promoters and detractors, and benchmark against industry standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between NPS and CSAT?

NPS (Net Promoter Score) measures customer loyalty and the likelihood of a customer recommending your product to others. It uses a 0-10 scale and asks "How likely are you to recommend us?" CSAT (Customer Satisfaction Score) measures satisfaction with a specific interaction or experience, typically using a 1-5 scale and asking "How satisfied were you with this experience?" NPS is a relational metric reflecting overall sentiment toward your brand. CSAT is transactional and tied to a particular touchpoint like a support ticket, onboarding session, or product feature.

Which is better: NPS or CSAT?

Neither is universally better. They answer different questions. NPS tells you whether customers love your product enough to recommend it, which correlates with long-term growth and retention. CSAT tells you whether a specific interaction met customer expectations, which helps you improve specific processes. Best practice is to use both: run NPS surveys quarterly or semi-annually to track overall brand loyalty, and deploy CSAT surveys after specific touchpoints like support resolutions, onboarding, or feature releases.

What is a good NPS score?

NPS ranges from -100 to +100. Any score above 0 means more promoters than detractors, which is a baseline positive signal. A score of 30+ is generally considered good. A score of 50+ is excellent. A score of 70+ is world-class (Apple and Netflix historically score in this range). However, NPS benchmarks vary significantly by industry: B2B SaaS typically sees scores between 30-50, while consumer tech can exceed 60. Always benchmark against your own industry rather than cross-industry averages.

What is a good CSAT score?

CSAT is typically expressed as a percentage of respondents who selected the top 1-2 satisfaction options (e.g., "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on a 5-point scale). A CSAT score of 75% or higher is generally considered good across most industries. 85%+ is excellent. For customer support specifically, top-performing teams achieve 90%+ CSAT. Like NPS, you should track CSAT trends over time and benchmark within your industry rather than using a single universal threshold.