Competitive Analysis

Strategic competitive analysis with SWOT and positioning

analysisPopularintermediateSWOTPositioning MatrixCompetitive Strategy1500-2000 words
Customize Your Prompt
Fill in the variables to generate your personalized prompt
Preview
See how your prompt will look with the current variables
You are a Product Strategy Consultant conducting a strategic competitive analysis of [Your Product] against [Main Competitors].

Analyze using these frameworks:

## 1. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE OVERVIEW
- Market positioning of each competitor
- Market share estimates
- Target customer segments
- Pricing strategies

## 2. FEATURE COMPARISON MATRIX
Create a detailed comparison table:
- Core features (rate 1-5)
- Unique differentiators
- Feature gaps
- Technical capabilities

## 3. SWOT ANALYSIS
For both your product and key competitors:
### Strengths
- Core competencies
- Market advantages
### Weaknesses
- Product limitations
- Market challenges
### Opportunities
- Market gaps
- Emerging trends
### Threats
- Competitive moves
- Market shifts

## 4. STRATEGIC POSITIONING
- 2x2 positioning matrix
- Competitive advantages
- Differentiation opportunities
- Blue ocean possibilities

## 5. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS
### Quick Wins (< 1 month)
- Feature parity items
- Marketing positioning
### Medium-term (1-3 months)
- Product enhancements
- Go-to-market changes
### Long-term (3-12 months)
- Strategic initiatives
- Market expansion

Base analysis on publicly available information and industry best practices.

## Web research, when available
- Search for facts relevant to this task, such as current prices, product capabilities, market data, or applicable requirements.
- Prefer primary sources. Cite the source title, direct URL, and publication or data date near each factual claim.
- Match source recency to the claim. Check current prices and capabilities; retain older research when it remains relevant and label its date.
- Explain material differences in definitions, samples, and time periods before comparing benchmarks. Report conflicting evidence and access limits.
- Keep sourced findings separate from assumptions and recommendations. Public research cannot establish private company metrics, customer quotes, or internal commitments.
- If browsing is unavailable or a fact cannot be verified, say so. Do not invent sources or imply a search was completed.

## Evidence and accuracy
- Use supplied facts and verified sources. Do not invent metrics, quotes, people, company details, commitments, or personal experience.
- Mark assumptions [ASSUMPTION], estimates [ESTIMATE: method], and unresolved questions [UNCERTAIN: reason]. Leave unavailable values unfilled rather than guessing.
- Explain confidence as high, medium, or low using the evidence available. These labels are judgments, not calibrated probabilities. Give numerical probabilities only when a stated method supports them.
- Treat preset weights, scores, timelines, and targets in this template as starting examples. Adapt them to the task and explain changes; they are not universal benchmarks or approved commitments.
- Define score scales and directions before calculating totals. Keep units, denominators, and time periods consistent. Do not average away a critical blocker.
- Use only exact supplied or verified quotes with attribution. Label requested fictional examples as illustrative. Distinguish observed behavior from inferred motives or causes.
- Use only the sections and rows the task needs. Write plainly, preserve necessary technical terms, and avoid unsupported benefits or forced specificity.
- Identify missing information needed for a decision. Recommendations remain proposals until reviewed by the responsible team.

## Evidence and accuracy
- Use supplied facts and verified sources. Do not invent metrics, quotes, people, company details, commitments, or personal experience.
- Mark assumptions [ASSUMPTION], estimates [ESTIMATE: method], and unresolved questions [UNCERTAIN: reason]. Leave unavailable values unfilled rather than guessing.
- Explain confidence as high, medium, or low using the evidence available. These labels are judgments, not calibrated probabilities. Give numerical probabilities only when a stated method supports them.
- Treat preset weights, scores, timelines, and targets in this template as starting examples. Adapt them to the task and explain changes; they are not universal benchmarks or approved commitments.
- Define score scales and directions before calculating totals. Keep units, denominators, and time periods consistent. Do not average away a critical blocker.
- Use only exact supplied or verified quotes with attribution. Label requested fictional examples as illustrative. Distinguish observed behavior from inferred motives or causes.
- Use only the sections and rows the task needs. Write plainly, preserve necessary technical terms, and avoid unsupported benefits or forced specificity.
- Identify missing information needed for a decision. Recommendations remain proposals until reviewed by the responsible team.

## Web research, when available
- Search for facts relevant to this task, such as current prices, product capabilities, market data, or applicable requirements.
- Prefer primary sources. Cite the source title, direct URL, and publication or data date near each factual claim.
- Match source recency to the claim. Check current prices and capabilities; retain older research when it remains relevant and label its date.
- Explain material differences in definitions, samples, and time periods before comparing benchmarks. Report conflicting evidence and access limits.
- Keep sourced findings separate from assumptions and recommendations. Public research cannot establish private company metrics, customer quotes, or internal commitments.
- If browsing is unavailable or a fact cannot be verified, say so. Do not invent sources or imply a search was completed.
What Makes a Good Competitive Analysis
  • • Clear market definition and ICP before any comparisons.
  • • Side‑by‑side comparisons that focus on outcomes, not checkbox features.
  • • Honest weaknesses and switching costs—yours and theirs.
  • • Differentiation framed as moats (distribution, data, network effects), not slogans.
  • • Pricing/packaging analysis with real plan pages and notes on add‑ons.
Common Competitive Analysis Mistakes
  • • Treating differentiation as a feature checklist—users buy outcomes.
  • • Using stale sources from last year's deck.
  • • Ignoring substitutes and “do nothing” as real competitors.
  • • Cherry‑picking categories where you already win.
  • • Confusing table stakes with differentiators (login ≠ advantage).
Questions PMs Actually Ask (Competitive Analysis)

What should I include in a competitive analysis?

Include the market definition, target customer, pricing, positioning, switching costs, and reasons for wins and losses. Cite sources and distinguish evidence from assumptions.

How often should I update competitive analysis?

Choose a review cadence based on how quickly the market changes, and check current pricing before launch or a pricing decision.

How do I find indirect competitors?

Look at jobs‑to‑be‑done and existing workflows: spreadsheets, agencies, internal tools. “Do nothing” is a competitor too—show why switching is worth it.

How do I compare features fairly?

Define scenarios and compare how well each product supports them, including time to value. Feature availability alone does not show how useful it is.

What if I don't have good public data?

Use pricing pages, job postings, release notes, review sites, and customer interviews. Triangulate. Say what's assumed vs. known.

Which frameworks actually help?

SWOT for clarity, 2×2 positioning for strategy, JTBD for real differentiation. Use as lenses, not crutches.

How do I avoid bias?

Ask sales and customer success to challenge the findings. Include specific areas where competitors perform better.

How do I turn this into roadmap decisions?

Group gaps by “table stakes vs advantage”. Table stakes get minimal parity; advantages get doubled down with moats (data, distribution).

How do I compare pricing apples‑to‑apples?

Normalize by unit (per user, per seat, per event). Include add‑ons and overage. Total cost at realistic usage beats headline prices.

Should we copy competitor X?

Consider it if the feature meets an important customer need or removes a barrier to switching. Compare that work with other ways to improve the product.

How to use this prompt

When to use it

Use this ahead of strategy reviews, pricing changes, or GTM planning. It covers positioning updates and decisions about feature parity and differentiation.

Before you use the output

  • •Fill in the variables with the facts and constraints you have.
  • •Check the output against your source material and revise any mistakes.
  • •Enable web search where available and check the dates and sources it returns.

Expected output

Strategic analysis with recommendations

Quick Info
Categoryanalysis
Output Length1500-2000 words
Web SearchSupported
Frameworks
SWOTPositioning MatrixCompetitive Strategy
Try PM Toolkit Calculators

Use the calculators to check the numbers behind a proposed product decision.