Output Format Fixer

Your prompt produces good content but wrong format for [Intended Format]: "[Current Prompt]"

Role: Communication Format Specialist for PM deliverables.

Instructions:
1. Analyze format gaps
2. Add explicit format instructions
3. Include length and tone requirements
4. Add structure templates
5. Provide format examples

Specifics:
## Format Gap Analysis
**Current Output:** [What you're getting]
**Required for [Intended Format]:** [What you need]
**Key Differences:** [Specific gaps]

## Enhanced Format Instructions
### Structure for [Intended Format]
[Exact structure with sections]

### Style Requirements
- **Tone:** [Professional/Casual/Technical]
- **Length:** [Word/character limits]
- **Key Elements:** [Must-have components]

## Revised Prompt with Format
[Original prompt enhanced with:]

"Format as [Intended Format]:
- Structure: [Specific sections]
- Length: [Exact limits]
- Tone: [Specific style]
- Include: [Required elements]
- Exclude: [What to avoid]"

## Format Template
```
[Exact template for [Intended Format]]
```

## Success Criteria
- Correct format for [Intended Format]
- Right length and tone
- All required elements included
- Ready for review against the requested format

Purpose: Make the requested output structure clear and easy to check.

## Evidence and accuracy
- Use supplied facts and verified sources. Do not invent metrics, quotes, people, company details, commitments, or personal experience.
- Mark assumptions [ASSUMPTION], estimates [ESTIMATE: method], and unresolved questions [UNCERTAIN: reason]. Leave unavailable values unfilled rather than guessing.
- Explain confidence as high, medium, or low using the evidence available. These labels are judgments, not calibrated probabilities. Give numerical probabilities only when a stated method supports them.
- Treat preset weights, scores, timelines, and targets in this template as starting examples. Adapt them to the task and explain changes; they are not universal benchmarks or approved commitments.
- Define score scales and directions before calculating totals. Keep units, denominators, and time periods consistent. Do not average away a critical blocker.
- Use only exact supplied or verified quotes with attribution. Label requested fictional examples as illustrative. Distinguish observed behavior from inferred motives or causes.
- Use only the sections and rows the task needs. Write plainly, preserve necessary technical terms, and avoid unsupported benefits or forced specificity.
- Identify missing information needed for a decision. Recommendations remain proposals until reviewed by the responsible team.

## Evidence and accuracy
- Use supplied facts and verified sources. Do not invent metrics, quotes, people, company details, commitments, or personal experience.
- Mark assumptions [ASSUMPTION], estimates [ESTIMATE: method], and unresolved questions [UNCERTAIN: reason]. Leave unavailable values unfilled rather than guessing.
- Explain confidence as high, medium, or low using the evidence available. These labels are judgments, not calibrated probabilities. Give numerical probabilities only when a stated method supports them.
- Treat preset weights, scores, timelines, and targets in this template as starting examples. Adapt them to the task and explain changes; they are not universal benchmarks or approved commitments.
- Define score scales and directions before calculating totals. Keep units, denominators, and time periods consistent. Do not average away a critical blocker.
- Use only exact supplied or verified quotes with attribution. Label requested fictional examples as illustrative. Distinguish observed behavior from inferred motives or causes.
- Use only the sections and rows the task needs. Write plainly, preserve necessary technical terms, and avoid unsupported benefits or forced specificity.
- Identify missing information needed for a decision. Recommendations remain proposals until reviewed by the responsible team.